Ovarian torsion: incremental role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound
- 1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
- 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India
- Correspondence to Dr Smita Manchanda; smitamanchanda@gmail.com
Abstract
We highlight the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a supplementary modality to ultrasound (USG) examination in ovarian torsion in this case report. The reported patient had clinical history suspicious of ovarian torsion; however, USG and Doppler flow study findings were equivocal. CEUS was performed to solve the diagnostic dilemma and to know the status of ovarian parenchymal viability which revealed non-enhancement of the ovarian cyst wall and pedicle throughout the USG examination thus establishing the diagnosis of non-viable or infarcted ovarian parenchyma. The per operative and histopathology findings were consistent with our CEUS findings. CEUS is an emerging promising modality which provides information regarding parenchymal perfusion, resulting in a reliable diagnosis of ovarian torsion along with information on ovarian parenchymal viability. This ability makes CEUS equivalent to contrast-enhanced CT or MRI.
Background
Adnexal torsion is a gynaecological surgical emergency.1 Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian torsion along with information regarding viability is important from the surgical point of view, as in the absence of a grossly necrotic ovary, intraoperative untwisting of the adnexa can be performed for ovarian salvage without significant risk of thromboembolism. Haemorrhagic infarction or gangrene, however, requires surgical removal without any attempt to untwist the ovarian torsion.2
Ultrasound (USG) along with colour Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) is the first-line imaging modality for the evaluation of suspected ovarian torsion; however, it has the following limitations. It is highly operator dependent, colour Doppler cannot detect slow flow or may pick up false signal from tissue movement. Besides, the spontaneous torsion and detorsion of ovary can produce variable patterns of Doppler flow which makes definitive diagnosis even more difficult. Even the established USG/CDUS signs suggestive of ovarian torsion do not always allow for a definitive diagnosis.3 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an excellent technique which overcomes these limitations. It determines an organ’s vascular supply since the contrast agent is purely intravascular and provides information regarding the parenchymal perfusion, resulting in a reliable diagnosis of ovarian torsion along with information about the ovarian parenchymal viability, similar to contrast-enhanced CT and MRI.4 5 Thus, CEUS allows accurate and timely diagnosis, serving as a useful supplementary imaging modality with the added advantage of lack of ionising radiation.
Case presentation
A woman in her 20s presented in the emergency with sudden onset, severe, intermittent lower abdominal pain for 1 week. She had no gastrointestinal or genitourinary complaint. She had normal, regular menstrual cycles and her last normal menstrual period was 10 days back. She did not have any significant medical or surgical history. On general physical examination, she had normal vitals; however, there was severe pallor. Her pelvic examination revealed a large, palpable, tender, immobile pelvic mass of size approximately 10×10 cm.
Investigations
The laboratory parameters at the time of presentation revealed neutrophilic leucocytosis, anaemia (haemoglobin 3.5 g/dL), elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and C reactive protein.
She underwent a transabdominal B-mode USG evaluation initially on Supersonic Imagine Aixplorer equipment using a curvilinear probe by an experienced radiologist. It revealed a large, thick-walled, right ovarian cyst with no obvious septations or solid component (figure 1A) and peripherally displaced ovarian follicles, located in midline in the pelvis and cranial to the uterine fundus. The right ovarian pedicle appeared thickened. The left ovary was well visualised. Colour Doppler was also performed which did not reveal any vascularity within the thick walls of the cyst (figure 1B). Transvaginal USG was not performed as the patient was an unmarried female and refused to give consent for the same. The patient had already undergone a CECT Abdomen prior to presentation at our institution. This CT scan had revealed a large, midline, adnexal cystic lesion measuring approximately 10×8 cm with eccentrically thick, hyperattenuating wall on non-contrast scan and equivocal wall enhancement (figure 2). To evaluate the ovarian parenchyma vascularity and viability, we proceeded to CEUS.
(A) Large, thick-walled, right adnexal cyst (*) with no obvious septations or solid component seen on ultrasound. (B) Colour Doppler did not reveal any vascularity within the thick walls (block arrow) of the cyst.
(A) Large, midline, right adnexal cystic lesion (*) with an eccentrically thick, hyperattenuating wall (block arrow) on the non-contrast scan. (B) Ambiguous wall enhancement in the cyst wall (block arrow) on contrast-enhanced CT.
The patient was screened for contraindications for SonoVue, including a history of allergies to sulphur hexafluoride or other components, left-to-right shunt congenital heart disease, severe pulmonary hypertension, uncontrolled hypertension, adult respiratory distress syndrome and pregnancy or breastfeeding. A written informed consent for the procedure was obtained.
CEUS was performed on the same equipment (Supersonic Imagine Aixplorer). Intravenous access was established in the antecubital fossa (antecubital vein) using a 20G cannula with a 3-way connector. The ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) Sonovue was reconstituted (25 mg of lyophilised sulphur hexafluoride powder in 5 mL normal saline) as a soluble agent 5 min before starting the study and agitated well to generate microbubbles. The right adnexal cyst was focused on B-mode USG and the field of interest was maintained, followed by switching on the CEUS mode in dual window setting to allow simultaneous display of tissue and contrast signals on the monitor. Meanwhile, 2.4 mL Sonovue bolus was administered intravenously followed by flushing with 10 mL normal saline. The right adnexal cyst wall vascularity was assessed in real time by continuous scanning and simultaneous acquisition of images till 300 s (5 min) post UCA administration.
The patient was observed in the emergency room following the procedure for duration of half an hour for possible adverse reaction caused by the UCA. She did not show symptoms or signs of any adverse reaction.
CEUS findings
CEUS revealed non-enhancement of the ovarian cyst wall and the thickened pedicle throughout the USG examination which was distinct from clearly enhancing left ovary (figure 3). These findings were suggestive of non-viable or infarcted ovarian parenchyma. So, the imaging-based diagnosis was complete right ovarian torsion with infarction; and ovarian cyst as leading point.
(A) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) revealed non-enhancement of the right ovarian cyst wall and thickened pedicle (arrowhead) compared with the left ovary (L.O.). These findings were suggestive of non-viable or infarcted ovarian parenchyma. So, the imaging-based diagnosis was complete right ovarian torsion with ovarian cyst as the leading point. (B) Colour Doppler ultrasound revealed no colour flow in the involved right ovary, and despite the lowest possible scale settings, no colour flow could be observed in the contralateral normal ovary (L.O.) as well. Thus, CEUS proved to be a very helpful modality in our patient as it established the diagnosis by depicting non-enhancement of the involved ovary.
Treatment
In view of the non-viable ovarian tissue, the patient underwent surgical removal of the right ovary and fallopian tube. The per operative findings were consistent with the imaging findings which showed a thick-walled cyst with multiple twists in the pedicle (figure 4). Intraoperative frozen sections and subsequent histopathology findings of the right ovarian cyst revealed ovarian tissue with haemorrhagic necrosis and dystrophic calcification, consistent with torsion. Sections from the fallopian tube also showed haemorrhagic necrosis.
Haemorrhagic cyst (*) with multiple twists in pedicle (arrow) seen intraoperatively.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report, including accompanying images.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient is stable on follow-up visits with no abdominal pain and normal menstrual cycles. She returned to her daily normal activities within 2 weeks of surgery and is currently asymptomatic.
Discussion
The USG and CDUS signs in the setting of ovarian torsion are well established in literature; however, it is not always practically possible to reach a diagnosis preoperatively based on these signs, as was in our case.3 Out of the previously described USG signs, an enlarged right ovary with a large cyst and peripherally displaced ovarian follicles was seen in our case. Although the right adnexal cyst was likely the leading point of ovarian torsion, these findings could also be explained by the mass effect exerted by the large adnexal cyst. Positive whirlpool sign (round, echogenic structure with multiple, concentric, hypoechoic target patterns) considered the most definitive sign of ovarian torsion could not be seen. The visualised ovarian stroma appeared to show normal echotexture with no signs of oedema or haemorrhage. CDUS revealed no colour flow in the involved right ovary. However, despite the lowest possible scale settings, no colour flow could be observed in the contralateral normal ovary as well. CEUS proved to be a helpful modality in our patient, as it established the diagnosis by depicting non-enhancement of the involved ovary. It also solved the dilemma regarding parenchymal viability which was not overcome by Doppler due to its inability to pick slow flow. It was also not solved by CECT due to hyperattenuating cyst wall on NCCT and thus ambiguous contrast enhancement perception on CECT.
UCA is a microbubble agent which works as a reflector of USG energy, thus enhancing the overall image contrast. Being purely an intravascular agent with no leakage in the surrounding tissue, UCA truly represents the vascular supply to the organ being examined, which is a crucial factor in determining tissue viability.4 Organs with good vascular supply show good enhancement on CEUS and the degree of enhancement is proportional to the organ perfusion since the replenishment rate of the new UCA microbubbles in the area of interest is reflective of the regional blood flow rate. As a result, reduced perfusion areas appear hypoenhancing on CEUS, making it possible to detect small changes in perfusion at an early stage itself.4 6 This property of UCA and CEUS can be used in suspected cases of ovarian torsion which can be seen as discrepant enhancement between normal and abnormal ovary on CEUS.7 Complete lack of enhancement can be interpreted as infarcted parenchyma, necrotic, non-viable parenchyma as was seen in our patient. It can identify the ‘whirlpool sign’ of the twisted vascular pedicle as well.7 CEUS can also solve the diagnostic dilemma in chronic and intermittent torsions by depicting an inhomogenous, hypoenhancing ovary and thus providing better results compared with USG and Doppler.8 The USG, Doppler and CEUS findings are summarised in table 1.
Review of literature summarising the key ultrasound, Doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) findings of ovarian torsion
Author and year | No of patients | Mean age (years) |
USG findings | CDUS findings | CEUS findings |
Trinci et al 20213 |
20 | 10.5±1.2 | Ovarian enlargement, peripheral follicles, increase of adnexal parenchymal echogenicity, ovarian shift from its normal location, free fluid | Absence of arterial and venous flow in the ovary and decreased venous flow, Whirlpool sign |
USG morphology signs of torsion with lack of contrast enhancement, free fluid |
Laclergie et al 2020 |
17 | 11.5±3.6 | Ovarian enlargement, ovarian lesion, pelvic fluid, follicles around periphery, whirl sign | Absent or minimal vascular flow, Twisted pedicle | Absence of contrast enhancement in the arterial, venous and washout times, delay of contrast enhancement |
-
CDUS, colour Doppler ultrasound; USG, ultrasound.
For B-mode USG, the sensitivity and specificity are, respectively, 42.9% and 81.8%, while for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, they are 100% and 81.8%. B-mode USG has positive and negative predictive values of 60% and 69.2%, compared with 77.8% and 100% for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Efficiency for B-mode USG is 66.7%, whereas for CEUS it was 88.9%.9
CEUS has the advantage that patient evaluation can be done quickly at the bedside, without exposure to ionising radiation or risk of an anaphylactic reaction or renal failure. The use of contrast-enhanced US is a short learning curve for a radiologist who is already skilled in USG.10 The contraindications are minimal including previous hypersensitivity reactions, intracardiac shunts and intra-arterial injection.11 It provides information regarding parenchymal microvasculature even in very small-sized vessels, and overcomes the difficulty in detecting slow flow because even the stationary microbubbles can be detected in CEUS.11 Other disadvantages of CDUS solved by CEUS include false signal due to tissue movement and variable colour flow patterns in intrapedicular vessels depending on the degree and duration of ovarian torsion (eg, abnormality in the venous flow may be the only sign of torsion and occurs before arterial occlusion or maintained both arterial and venous flow in partial or early torsion). CEUS also provides continuous information for 5–7 min, unlike contrast-enhanced CT or MRI which provide information in phases. The European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology has for the first time highlighted the potential utility of CEUS for assessing small organs in adults in their imaging recommendations in 2018.12 The limitation of CEUS is primarily the high cost, limited availability and few contraindications as detailed above.
Radiologists and emergency physicians should be aware of the potential utility of CEUS in difficult situations where the clinical suspicion of ovarian torsion is high but USG and Doppler studies are inconclusive. Diagnostic laparoscopy is the gold standard, especially in settings where CEUS is not available. In settings with easy availability of USG contrast agents with trained sonographers, the addition of CEUS to routine emergency USG provides information regarding organ perfusion and thus helps the surgeon to decide the line of management easily and quickly at the bedside with minimal contraindications. The high negative predictive value of CEUS is a huge advantage since when CEUS is not in favour of ovarian torsion, it is possible to defer surgery.8
Patient’s perspective
I was very disturbed by the severe pain I was having in my lower abdomen. I could not understand if it had any relation to my periods. My mother became very apprehensive when we were told that I had a large mass in my abdomen. After the contrast study, we were clearly explained about the twisting of my ovary and the need for surgery. My mother was concerned about my marriage and fertility issues but we were reassured about the other normal ovary. Now after the surgery, I am completely pain-free and looking forward to my marriage.
Learning points
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a supplementary modality to ultrasound (USG) to solve the diagnostic dilemma, often encountered in patients with suspected ovarian torsion due to equivocal USG/colour Doppler findings.
-
CEUS provides information regarding parenchymal perfusion, resulting in a reliable diagnosis of ovarian torsion along with information on ovarian parenchymal viability, which is of immense utility in deciding the surgical management of the patient.
-
Advantages of CEUS include bedside availability, lack of ionising radiation, minimal contraindications, providing information regarding parenchymal microvasculature and providing continuous information for 5–7 min.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Footnotes
-
Contributors SG: literature search, manuscript preparation. SM: conception and design of work, manuscript preparation and editing. VD: manuscript editing.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer